Reviewers play an essential part in science and in scholarly publishing. For more than 300 years, scientists and scholars have relied upon peer-review to validate research, engage other specialists in the support of submitted work, and increase networking possibilities within specific specialist communities. AfJEM is no different. All original submissions to AfJEM pass through a rigorous double-blinded peer review process, with each submission reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers as well as an editor; submissions with complex statistical content are usually further reviewed for accuracy. AfJEM looks upon the peer-review process as an additional layer of mentoring for authors. It is supplemented through our novel Author Assist programme.
Important reviewer information
Free reviewer resources
Want to review for AfJEM?
Important reviewer information
Free reviewer resources
- Elsevier Researcher Academy peer review modules
- Free 30-day access to Scopus following a review
- Free 30-day access to ScienceDirect following a review
- Online Reviewers’ Information Pack
- Elsevier reviewer's update
Want to review for AfJEM?
You keen to take your research and review skills to the next level? Contact the editor and let us know.
